Project

Reducing Environmental Stress in the Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem (YSLME)

Resources (109)
Map
Name Media Type Language Date
KML English 01 Jan 2016
KML English 01 Jan 2016
KML English 01 Jan 2016
KML English 01 Jan 2016
Mid-Term Evaluation
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
Newsletter
Presentation
Report
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 17 Jul 2012
PDF English 16 Jul 2012
PDF English 16 Jul 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 24 Oct 2018
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 18 Jul 2012
PDF English 17 Jul 2012
PDF English 16 Jul 2012
PDF English 16 Jul 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 31 Oct 2012
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 24 Oct 2018
TDA
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 14 May 2014
Workshop
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 10 Jan 2014
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
DOC English 14 Jun 2012
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 28 Jun 2018
PDF English 20 Sep 2018
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 04 May 2010
PDF English 10 Jan 2014
DOC English 14 Jun 2012
PDF English 28 Jun 2018
PDF English 20 Sep 2018

Key Basin Project Results

1. Adopted ecosystem-based approach for preparation of TDA and SAP as the first IW project using the approach. The TDA process has helped the participating countries to collect about 30 years historical data and information. With the scientific data, information and knowledge, TDA has successfully identified the environmental problems, the priorities, and causes of the problem, which well served as scientific bases for the preparation of SAP. The SAP, based on the ecosystem services, defined the tangible management targets (e.g. reducing up to 30% fishing boats, and reduce 10% nutrients every 5 years), and effective management actions. 2. Enhanced regional and national co-operation and co-ordination in protection of marine environment, and sustainable uses of marine and coastal resources with an agreement to establish a YSLME Commission as long term management body for the regional co-operation. During the project implementation period, the Project Steering Committee (PSC) and the Regional Scientific and Technical Panel (RSTP) have been established for regional cooperation; and the Inter-ministry Co-ordinating Committees (IMCC) are in charge of national coordination. The mechanism has worked effectively, with the regional co-operative cruises and the joint regional fishery stock assessment, (both are the first times in the region) as successful example. Beside the formal participating countries, the Project has successfully involved DPR Korea participated in the major project activities and training courses, as observer. 3. Ungraded national capacities and public awareness of all stakeholders in marine environment protection, including parliamentary conferences, NGOs, local governments, and private sectors. The Regional Parliamentary Conferences have involved about 30 parliamentary members to raise awareness and knowledge of the importance of marine environment to the parliamentary organizations in the countries, who have major responsibilities in managing marine environment, e.g. legislations, institutional reform, and increasing budget. Involvement of NGOs and private sections into the project implementation has not only established the Yellow Sea Partner, but also generated substantial financial support. Panasonic provided about $ 1.8 million to the biodiversity conservation in the Yellow Sea.

Results Indicators

Municipal wastewater pollution reduction

[see desc]

INDICATOR#3. It was agreed by the governments of the participating countries to reduce 10% nutrient discharge to the marine environment every 5 years. The relevant actions in establishing new waste water treatment plants, improve existing waste water treatment abilities are undertaken in the countries.
Reduced fishing pressure

0.3

Tangible targets on reducing fishing efforts were agreed, including reducing 30% fishing boats. The relevant actions (including boat buy-back and training on alternative livelihood, etc.) are undertaken in the countries.
Improved use of fish gear/techniques

[see desc]

Sustainable mariculture has been seriously considered. The Integrated MultiTrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) and Heterotrophic shrimp culture have been implemented in the participating countries, The results of these activities show that while the farmers obtain better economic yield, the marine environment are not affected comparing to the traditional methods of mariculture.
Establishment of country-specific inter-ministerial committees

YES

INDICATOR#1. The Inter-Ministry Co-ordinating Committees (IMCC) has been established in both China and R. Korea, and the Committees are functioning in a satisfactory ways. The major project decisions are made based on the decisions and agreements of the IMCC.
Regional legal agreements and cooperation frameworks

YES

Enhanced regional and national co-operation and co-ordination in protection of marine environment, and sustainable uses of marine and coastal resources with an agreement to establish a YSLME Commission as long term management body for the regional co-operation. During the project implementation period, the Project Steering Committee (PSC) and the Regional Scientific and Technical Panel (RSTP) have been established for regional cooperation; and the Inter-ministry Co-ordinating Committees (IMCC) are in charge of national coordination. The mechanism has worked effectively, with the regional co-operative cruises and the joint regional fishery stock assessment, (both are the first times in the region) as successful example. Beside the formal participating countries, the Project has successfully involved DPR Korea participated in the major project activities and training courses, as observer.
Regional Management Institutions

YES

Body: Yellow Sea Commission GEF Project: INDICATOR#2. Following effective discussions and negotiations of the governments of the participating countries, it was formally agreed, and included in the Strategic Action Programme (SAP) that a YSLME Commission should be established with major responsibilities to coordinate the regional efforts in implementing SAP, and long-term co-operation; INDICATOR#5. The Yellow Sea Partnership has been established with participations of more than 20 institutions, including UN agencies and projects, international NGOs, local NGOs, and research institutes. The Partnership will serve as co-ordinating mechanism for the relevant activities in marine environment protection and conservation actions in the Yellow Sea INDICATOR#7. Regional MPA network has been established and functioning for better conservation of marine biodiversity in the Yellow Sea. With the offer of a local government, the secretariat of the Network may be established within 2011. It will ensure self-sustaining of the MPA Network.
Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis: Agreement on transboundary priorities and root causes

YES

INDICATOR#3. The Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), has been formally endorsed by the full members of the project, i.e. China and R. Korea. The document has also been formally supported by DPR Korea as an observer of the project;
Development of Strategic Action Program (SAP)

YES

INDICATOR#4. The Regional SAP has been formally endorsed by the full members of the project, i.e. China and R. Korea. The document has also been formally supported by DPR Korea as an observer of the project. The National SAPs have been endorsed by the respective governments of China and R. Korea.

Information sources

IWC6 Results Note (2011)

The Yellow Sea is one of the most intensely exploited areas in the world. Approximately 10% of the world population lives in the area that drains to the Yellow Sea. This Sea is a semi-enclosed basin, shallow but reach in resources, and its waters are a highway for international shipping. Large cities, among them Shanghai, Dalian, Tianjin and Seoul, depend on the Yellow Sea as a source of marine resources for human nutrition, economic development, reacreation and tourism.

The analysis conducted during PDF-B works indicated the following major transboundary environmental problems:

  • (i) Decline/collapse of transboundary fish stocks;
  • (ii) degradation of Biodiversity and of critical habitats;
  • (iii) water quality deterioration;
  • (iv) unsanitary conditions due to dispersion of pathogens and contaminants threatening human health and mariculture.

The objective of the proposed project is to promote multi-country ecosystem based management practices with the aim of reducing stresses to the environment due to population and industrialization pressures. The project will enhance consultations among littoral countries building on existing partial agreements (APEC etc.) and operationalizing elements of UNEP's Regional Seas Programme (NOWPAP). The project will complement activities of the East Asian Seas GEF project and of the Tumen River GEF projects.

Project Category

Large Marine Ecosystem

Waterbodies

Yellow Sea (LME)

Ecosystems

LME

Budget

USD 24,696,248

Total Cost of the project

USD 14,394,183

GEF Allocation to project

Partners

United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS)

The UN Office for Project Services - UNOPS - manages project resources to help developing nations and countries in transition in their quest for peace, social stability, economic growth and sustainable development.

Contacts

Andrew Menz

Deputy Regional Director

Yihang Jiang

Project Manager

Euidea Yun

IT Specialist

Isao Endo

Environmental Economist

Mark Walton

Fisheries and Biodiversity Officer

Jongtae Choi

IT Administrator

Connie Chiang

Project Manager

Andrew Hudson

Head of Water & Ocean Governance

Jose Erezo Padilla

Regional technical Adviser(RTA)

GEF ID

790

Status

closed

Project Type

Full-Size Project

Start Date

12 Apr, 2004

End Date

31 Mar, 2011

Last Update

12 Dec, 2020