Project

Developing the Implementation of the Black Sea Strategic Action Plan (BSSAP)

Resources (4)

Key Basin Project Results

[LME] "1. A Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA) was prepared, leading to a Black Sea Strategic Action Plan, and both were revisited after 10 years and updated in Phase II of the project. 2. All six Black Sea countries developed National Strategic Action Plans. 3. The key issue identified in the TDA/SAP – the need to reduce nutrient inputs to the Black Sea, especially from the Danube – was addressed through investment, policy and regulatory reform, capacity building, scientific research, and public outreach, resulting in reduced Danube pollution loads and clear signs of recovery of the Black Sea ecosystem, including the elimination of the NW shelf hypoxic zone."(#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation)

Catalytic Impacts

[see 2263]

Results Indicators

Revised Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA)/Strategic Action Program (SAP) including Climatic Variability and Change considerations

NO

-
Municipal wastewater pollution reduction

NA

• Municipal BOD5 emissions from Ukraine have fallen by about one-third and from Romania by about two-thirds since the late 1990s. • Mykolayiv City’s water treatment utility was assisted in developing a proposed short term investment program (STIP), incorporating recommendations for financial and operational performance improvement. A technical, financial and institutional review of the Crimean Water Supply and Sewerage Sector was completed, including a STIP proposal, and terms of reference for further technical assistance were developed. (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation)
Industrial wastewater pollution reduction

NA

The industrial/transport and municipal component included 4 sets of activities including the establishment of inventories of industrial, transport and municipal pollution sources, developing criteria and then revising hot spot identification, reviewing policies and legislation, and organising workshops to introduce BAT and financial support mechanisms. Achievements under this output are deemed to be marginally satisfactory. The Project team was limited in its achievement in particular by the difficulty in getting reliable data from the countries. Initial expectations were that the BSC Secretariat would provide useful data, yet data quality checking was a problem and some data was purposefully withheld. Secretariat staff and some of the responsible country ministries insisted that their industrial point sources discharge data was confidential and could not be viewed or utilised by the project Team. As clearly stated by the BSERP PIU, the information provided through this exercise, and included in the BSIS, is deeply flawed and serves mostly to over-report the extent of pollution loading from the Danube. (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation)
Agriculture pollution reduction practices

N: 36000 MT/yr, P: 6000 KT/yr

[LME] • Net reduction in nitrogen loads from the Danube to the Black Sea was estimated to be 36,000 mt/year, between the 1988-1996 average (364 kt/year) before the UNDP-GEF involvement, and the average over the 1999-2008 GEF period of 328 kt/year. • Inorganic phosphorus loads from the Danube to the Black Sea dropped 5-6 kt/year against their mid-nineties highs of around 10-12 kt/year. • Regional numbers of livestock decreased by about one third between 1988 and 1997, with a similar level of decrease between 1997 and 2003. During 2003 inorganic fertiliser application rates in Romania were about one third of the level applied in 1998. Inorganic fertilizer application rates in Turkey were higher than in other Black Sea countries, with medium levels applied in Bulgaria, Georgia and Romania. The lowest fertiliser application rates were found in Russia and Ukraine. • With policy advisory support from the BSERP as well as the UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project, and driven by various international commitments, most Danube and Black Sea countries have taken important steps to reform and implement their nutrient management policies and legislation (fertiliser use, manure management, etc.). Reduction in nutrient loads to the Black Sea will continue over time as the very high level of accumulated fertiliser and manure nitrate in Danube basin groundwater gradually diminishes with improved management practices. (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation) [Agricultural Pollution Control - Turkey] "With a significant increase in the adoption of environmentally friendly agricultural practices through project support, it is expected that the intended objective of the project, i.e. reduction in nutrient loads to local soil and water bodies in the targeted micro-catchment areas, would be met. The project closes in June 2012; the impact evaluation will be undertaken at that time to assess the level of N and P reductions through project interventions and improvements in the quality of water entering the Black Sea. INDICATOR#1: Increased number of farmers in project area adopting environmentally friendly agricultural practices towards nutrient discharge reduction. During project preparation, surveys indicated that virtually no farmers in project micro-catchments were processing or using manure or efficiently; insignificant measures were in place for reducing nutrient discharge. To date, the project has trained 90% (3,500) people in nutrient management practices. A significant number of farmers are now implementing environmentally friendly agricultural practices. There is a large increase in vegetative cover; crop productivity, as a proxy for soil fertility, has also increased (ranging between 30% and 145% depending on variety); training in organic farming has resulted in sustainable use of manure as fertilizer and increased marketing of organic products, resulting in improved incomes. INDICATOR#2: Agricultural pollution into the Black Sea is reduced in pilot micro-catchments and efforts are underway to scale up these investments. Project activities, including, inter alia, the development and adoption of packages of investments and practices for nutrient discharge reduction, development and implementation of a water quality monitoring program, development and enforcement of legal institutional and regulatory mechanisms which has been mainstreamed into ministry operations and an effective public awareness program are contributing to reductions in nutrient loads entering soil and water bodies in the project area. A replication strategy is under preparation as part of the National Watershed Management Strategy." (#1074, Anatolia Watershed)
Reduced fishing pressure

NA

The Fisheries component included 5 separate activities: assisting the BSC on a legally binding document (LBD) for fisheries protection, carrying out a study on sensitive habitats and nursing grounds – with recommendations on fisheries – free zones and MPAs, annexes to the Bucharest Convention „Biodiversity‟ Protocol, elaborate stock assessment approaches on migratory fish, and to organise a regional workshop on regional stock assessments. Achievements in this output were unsatisfactory, however most of the responsibility for this lack of progress rests with the partner countries, not with the BSERP team.
Establishment of country-specific inter-ministerial committees

TBD

-
Regional legal agreements and cooperation frameworks

YES

Black Sea Convention
Regional Management Institutions

YES

Body: Black Sea Commission GEF Project Result: "Operational structures and management tools of the Black Sea Commission were strengthened, including an Institutional Strengthening Review and an Exit Strategy. • A draft Legally Binding Document on Fisheries was approved by the BSC in 2004. " (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation)
National/Local reforms

YES

[LME] "The project played a positive role in consolidation of the network of national Black Sea conservation institutions; actualization of the protection legislation; national investment in Black Sea protection; countries’ involvement in progressing toward Black Sea protection; and information exchange among the countries." (#397, Black Sea Environment) "• Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) was strengthened in line with EU Directives. Romania and Bulgaria implemented national laws and management instruments specifically on ICZM, while Georgia and Ukraine had draft ICZM laws in hand and Turkey carried out an ICZM pilot. • The Protocol for Land-based Activities (LBA) was concluded and adopted as a draft and was being facilitated through the national and regional negotiation process." (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation) [Agricultural Pollution] "INDICATOR #1: Development of a legal framework consistent with the EU Nitrates Directive for good agricultural practices. Turkish legislation with respect to nitrates pollution has been harmonized with the EU Nitrates Directive. Institutional and regulatory mechanisms are in place supporting water quality monitoring program which has been mainstreamed into Ministry operations." (#1074, Anatolia Watershed)
Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis: Agreement on transboundary priorities and root causes
Year: 2008

YES

"The TDA has been both updated and renewed, reflecting the recent GEF „best practises‟. The TDA has been published as a report as well as in a web-based version, accessible via the website of the BSC. Achievement for this output can be considered satisfactory. The TDA though has been issued rather late. A preliminary first draft was available in autumn 2006; the final draft was issued in January 2007. A combination of factors is responsible for the delays, including the time needed by the PIU for planning, for identification of local experts and for issuing subcontracts; the time needed for acquiring the data (there were 66 contributing specialists); data being provided in various formats (despite prescribed templates) and with a varying quality (requiring extra checks)." (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation)
Development of Strategic Action Program (SAP)
Year: 2008

YES

The SAP revision effort was carried out in the project 2nd phase, commencing after the TDA was completed in January 2007. The development process utilised a SAP Drafting Team including participants from each of the Black Sea countries. The SAP was revised, with the principle innovation being the introduction of Ecosystem Quality Objectives and a series of accompanying phased, step-by-step short, medium and long term targets. (#2263, Black Sea Rehabilitation) "• A total of 88 national and regional thematic assessments were produced, fueling the preparation of the Black Sea Strategic Action Program. • A Black Sea Strategic Action Program was developed and signed by the ministers of the environment of the six Black Sea countries. • A portfolio of urgent priority investments was identified and six pre-feasibility studies were implemented. " (#341, Black Sea SAP Development) • The project successfully helped countries to develop and draft National SAPs and adopted a basin-wide approach for co-ordination of activities for Black Sea protection. (#341, Black Sea SAP Development)

Information sources

UNDP Terminal Evaluation (2001) - #341, Results Note (2013) - #341, UNDP Terminal Evaluation (1997) - #397, UNDP Terminal Evaluation (2008) - #2263, 2013 IW Results Note - #2263

As a result of recent strong cooperation among the Black Sea countries, much of which was within the broad framework of the GEF Black Sea Environmental Programme (BSEP), an extensive effort has been made to gather, analyse and disseminate reliable information on the state of the Black Sea environment. These activities have confirmed the serious state of the commons and coastal environment and its consequences for the coastal economies of the six Black Sea countries. Particularly acute problems have arisen as a result of pollution (notably from nutrients, fecal material, solid waste and oil), a catastrophic decline in commercial fish stocks, a severe decrease in tourism and an uncoordinated approach towards coastal zone management. The transboundary nature of most of these problems, coupled with earlier political realities, was the main reason for the insufficiency of previous control measures. Only through acceptance of common but differentiated responsibilities, is it possible to take coherent actions to reverse this situation. The problems themselves, however, also have important extra-regional and global dimensions. One of the main factors in the decline of Black Sea fisheries, for example, was the massive invasion of the Black Sea by a comb jelly, Mnemiopsis leidyi, which was probably accidentally introduced one decade ago in ship-borne ballast water from the eastern seaboard of America. Unchecked by natural predators, Mnemiopsis attained a Black Sea biomass an order of magnitude higher than that of the world's annual fish harvest. Its presence in the Black Sea represents a threat to other regional seas. Similarly, quantities of persistent pollutants, such as persistent organic pollutants of global significance, reach the world ocean from the Black Sea basin and reduction in their sources to the Black Sea is an essential part of a global strategy to control them. Finally, the conservation of biodiversity in the Black Sea as well as the preservation of Black Sea habitats, vital for endangered migratory bird populations, has an important global significance. The six Black Sea coastal countries have initiated joint action to protect this unique environment. With the support from a GEF Pilot Phase programme, concrete, country-driven actions have been launched. However, because of the short time frame of the GEF Pilot Phase programme (three years, terminating on 30 June, 1996), the economic realities of the coastal countries and the recently approved GEF Operational Strategy, a new step has to be taken in order to allow a strategic reorientation of the project. While building upon the three year pilot phase activities, this project will enable the smooth transition by funding key activities to achieve the results required under the new GEF Operational Strategy on International Waters. In particular, it will allow the full development of the Black Sea Strategic Action Plan which will be consistent with the GEF Operational Strategy. In 1993, as a response to regional and global concern about the critically degraded environmental conditions in the Black Sea and to the positive policy initiative of the six Black Sea governments in subscribing to the 1992 Odessa Ministerial Declaration, a three-year GEF Pilot Phase project was approved. This project, entitled "Environmental Management and Protection of the Black Sea (RER/93/G31)" focused on three main objectives: (1) to strengthen and create regional capacities to manage the Black Sea ecosystem, (2) to develop an appropriate policy and legislative framework for the assessment, control and prevention of pollution and maintenance and enhancement of biodiversity, and (3) to facilitate the preparation of sound environmental investments. An independent evaluation of the project conducted in November 1995, revealed that "In general terms, the BSEP may be qualified as a success, and its approach towards achieving its goals could stand [as a] model for other complex regional programmes...". It also urged the GEF partners to continue their support for international actions to restore the Black Sea. During the three years since the creation of the BSEP, there has been an important additional development which has motivated the Black Sea Governments to formulate the present project brief. By early 1994, all six Governments had ratified the Bucharest Convention for the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution. The creation of a Black Sea Commission with a permanent Secretariat in Istanbul to be in place by mid-1996, will provide an essential mechanism for sustaining the achievements of the BSEP and implementing the Black Sea Strategic Action Plan. A major portion of the BSEP and its infrastructure can be gradually integrated into the Secretariat. However, there are still a number of barriers to be overcome: the legislative framework should be completed in order to operate effectively, the Odessa Declaration and the Black Sea Action Plan should be fully integrated as a single process. As required by the GEF Operational Strategy, on the basis of the transboundary water-related environmental analysis, a Strategic Action Plan (SAP) should now establish clear transboundary priorities as well as a realistic baseline for environmental commitments by the countries themselves. It also has to determine the agreed incremental costs for subsequent assistance. For this to occur, National Actions Plans addressing the priorities identified by the SAP have to be formulated and activities included in the SAP have to be realistically evaluated. In addition, it is be necessary to develop a basin-wide approach to manage pollution inputs to the Black Sea. This can only be properly achieved through full cooperation between all seventeen Black Sea basin countries, by ensuring the strategic coordination of GEF activities which should now be developed.

Project Category

Other (not set)

Waterbodies

Black Sea (LME)

Ecosystems

LME

Budget

USD 8,745,000

Total Cost of the project

USD 1,790,000

GEF Allocation to project

Partners

United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS)

The UN Office for Project Services - UNOPS - manages project resources to help developing nations and countries in transition in their quest for peace, social stability, economic growth and sustainable development.

Contacts

Iosefina Lipan

Regional Support Officer for Harmonisation with the EU Water Policies

Figen Canakci-Erpek

Financial Administrator

Basak Gunduz

Technical Assistant on Contracting

Bill Parr

Eutrophication/Marine Pollution Specialist

Vladimir Mamaev
Vladimir Mamaev

UNDP/GEF Regional Technical Advisor for International Waters for Europe, CIS and Arab States

GEF ID

341

Status

closed

Focal Area

International Waters

Project Type

Full-Size Project

Start Date

09 Apr, 1997

End Date

01 Dec, 2000

Last Update

06 Mar, 2018