Project

SIP-Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project II

Resources (57)
Document
Name Media Type Language Date
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
English 18 Feb 2014
File
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
Maps - Graphics / Maps
Name Media Type Language Date
KML English 29 May 2018
KML English 21 Nov 2018
KML English 29 May 2018
KML English 21 Nov 2018
Newsletter
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PPT English 09 Nov 2018
PDF English 28 Dec 2018
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PPT English 09 Nov 2018
PDF English 28 Dec 2018
Project Document
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 11 Jun 2018
PDF English 11 Jun 2018
Project Identification Form
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
Report
Name Media Type Language Date
PDF English 01 Jan 2016
PDF English 01 Jan 2016

Key Basin Project Results

"1. This project, including Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania, was the first of its kind in the region, and supported many knowledge-building activities that advanced the understanding of the Lake Ecosystem, particularly in the areas of biodiversity of fish (establishing a baseline), levels and sources of pollution, fish stocks, and hydrology. 2. Regional planning and implementation a great success. The LVFO (Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization) was operationalized, fisheries sector frameworks were harmonized, regional information exchange was strengthened and the East African Community (EAC) was re-established 3. Significant work of the fish quality lab resulted in lifting of the temporary European Union (EU) markets' ban on import of fish from the lake." (#88, Lake Victoria Basin) "1-Participatory stakeholders consultative process, led to the preparation of both five national (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda) and a regional Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), together with the Strategic Action Program (SAP) were completed, under the coordination of the Lake Victoria. 2-Joint Commitment by five countries to implement the adopted SAP, which aims at addressing key transboundary issues, by promoting sustainable economic growth and reducing environmental stress in the Lake Victoria Basin." (#2405, Lake Victoria II) "1. Improved collaborative management of the transboundary natural resources: draft reports produced and discussed with Partner States and development partners on (i) harmonization of regional policies for water resources management produced and (ii) on options for the establishment of a Lake Victoria Environmental Fund; fisheries frame survey conducted in Lake Victoria in a coordinated manner by Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, with support from Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization. 2. Development of institutional and human capacity: 508 industrialists from 107 industries trained in cleaner production technologies; Research Vessel Jumuiya rehabilitated, equiped, and available for use by all Partner States in Lake Victoria. 3. Reducing environmental stress in targeted pollution hotspots: inventory and GIS mapping of 387 hotspots of point sources of pollution involving 292 industries in the Lake Victoria Basin in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda; 88 industries mapped and 24 in-plant cleaner production assessments completed." (#3399, Lake Victoria Basin III)

Results Indicators

Municipal wastewater pollution reduction

[see desc]

Although pollution hotspots were identified, the merged component (including Water Quality, Industrial and Municipal Waste Management, and Management of Pollution Loading) became too focused on data collection with inadequate emphasis on addressing the critical pollution problems in the lake, especially related to urban wastewater flowing into the Winam Gulf at Kisumu. An industrial tertiary treatment pilot was set up but not subsequently applied on a larger scale. Improvement of Kisumu wastewater treatment plant had to be deferred when it became clear that IDA financing would not be extended. Attempts were made to model factors affecting water quality withoutsolid success.
Reduced fishing pressure

0.3

Support to co-management and creation of Beach Management Units (BMUs) has helped bring an estimated decline in illegal fishing by about one third. The component achieved notable success in harmonizing the fisheries legislative and regulatory frameworks among the three countries. The Fish Levy Trust (FLT) is not yet operational in Kenya. Gazetted fishing areas were established as were Community Conservation Committees; closed fishing seasons were instituted but need to be enforced.
Improved use of fish gear/techniques

[see desc]

INDICATOR 1. Completion of gazetting and regulating fish landing sites within pilot zone areas and enforcing acceptable fishing practices within a 5 km radius of fishing villages within these areas, with full participation of lakeshore fishing communities. Gazetting of landing areas was successfully undertaken. Co-management through 51 active Beach Management Units (BMUs) was noted. And overall illegal fishing reduced in all countries.
Catchment protection measures

[see desc]

The component undertook various activities in afforestation with support to community nurseries. It did not track cost-effectiveness, survival rate or have an exit strategy in place, which is likely to impede the success and survival rate of many of its activities. Nevertheless, the component collaborated with other catchment based activities to opportunities for diversification for communities. It is expected that the experience gained through this project will be useful in Kenya’s implementation of its Forest Policy, which emphasizes co-management.
Invasive species reduction

0.85

INDICATOR 2. Establishing sustainable long-term capacity for management and control of water hyacinth and other invasive weeds in Lake Victoria Basin, through integrated weed control methods and community involvement Even though the component sought primarily to strengthen capacity, implementation was able to move further and address the problem itself. Water Hyacinth infestation was reduced to biological equilibrium levels representing an approximately 85 % reduction of the previous levels. There was strong community involvement in control activities. There has been a remarkable decrease (85 percent) in the water hyacinth infestation in the Lake, which is down to non-nuisance levels. One of the pilots supported in Kenya under this component was subject to an Inspection Panel (discussed below) when an Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) complained that communities had not been consulted sufficiently regarding experimental mechanical chopping of hyacinth in their area. As a result of the Inspection Pane,l emphasis on consultation and community outreach in implementation of the project was increased. Mechanical chopping as a control mechanism was not further pursued because by that point it was clear that biological control was a superior approach.
Regional legal agreements and cooperation frameworks

YES

Instrument: protocol for sustainable development of the Lake Victoria Basin "INDICATOR 2. Harmonization among the three countries legislation addressing management of fisheries and environment variables important in the lake basin, and improved enforcement of this legislation. Notable success in harmonizing the fisheries legislation and regulatory frameworks among the three countries and enforcement of the fisheries legislation was initiated in all countries. The LVFO was established to play a crucial role in the implementation and enforcement of the legislations in the fisheries sector. Thr project also supported the development of co-management institutions or Beach Management Units (BMUs) and this institutional change helped improve the effectiveness of fisheries extension and strengthen fish quality assurance. " (#88, Lake Victoria Basin) "Lake Victoria Basin Commission is established by a protocol for sustainable development of Lake Victoria basin under article 33 as a permanent apex institution of the community responsible for the lake basin. The objectives and broad functions of the secretariat of the commission is to promote, coordinate and facilitate development initiatives within the Lake Victoria basin. The signing of the protocol for sustainable development of the Lake Victoria Basin on the 29th November 2003 and its ratification in December 2004, in effect cleared the way for the establishment of the lake Victoria Basin Commission." (#2405, Lake Victoria II) "Lake Victoria Basin Commission is established by a protocol for sustainable development of Lake Victoria basin under article 33 as a permanent apex institution of the community responsible for the lake basin. The objectives and broad functions of the secretariat of the commission is to promote, coordinate and facilitate development initiatives within the Lake Victoria basin. The signing of the protocol for sustainable development of the Lake Victoria Basin on the 29th November 2003 and its ratification in December 2004, in effect cleared the way for the establishment of the lake Victoria Basin Commission." (#3399, Lake Victoria Basin III)
Regional Management Institutions

YES

Bodies: Lake Victora Basin Commission, Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization GEF Project: "INDICATOR 1. Establishment of the Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization (LVFO) The project resulted in the LVFO being active and coordinating regional activities. The three countries made considerable progress in advancing the regional perspective in both planning and implementation. The Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization was operationalized, although it requires strengthening. Fisheries sector frameworks were harmonized and regional information exchange was strengthened. During the course of implementation of the project, the East African Community (EAC) was re-established and recognized coordination of activities in Lake Victoria as among its priorities. Although the role of the EAC was not foreseen during preparation of the project and required some adjustment in understanding of responsibilities, it has been an important breakthrough in facilitating shared management. The EAC passed the Lake Victoria Protocol and, with its ratification by member states in November 2004, created the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) based in Kisumu. A common Lake Victoria vision was developed by the partner states with extensive consultation at the community level. Through the EAC and LVBC it is expected that the riparian states will be in a strong position in the future to act on the enhanced knowledge about the lake by agreeing on common enforcement of standards and regulations, some of which are now on the books but unevenly enforced. The national secretariat was under the Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Wildlife, and reported to the Permanent Secretary of the ministry. The office was originally in Nairobi at the ministry headquarters, but moved to Kisumu in 2001/02 to be nearer the project operations, partly staffed by seconded ministerial staff and contract staff. Although systemic issues were a key factor in the delays in flow of funds, the secretariat's was unable effectively to address the problem. Long and continued dissatisfaction with the Secretariat’s performance resulted in the termination of the National Executive Secretary’s contract in May 2002. A new Secretary was appointed who remained until the end of 2002, when the whole Secretariat was dismissed due to heightened dissatisfaction with observed performance. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) was then made the implementing agency in recognition of KARI's past success in implementation of projects and due to the need to find an agency able to implement the GEF financed activities that had to continue in Kenya for the regional effort to succeed. The transition was far from smooth and the new secretariat was only able to come on board in late 2003. This secretariat functioned strictly in a coordinating role and left implementation to the components. The components did appreciate the facilitative role of the coordinator in Kisumu, and KARI supported an increased pace of implementation compared to the earlier period. Nevertheless, implementation continued to be constrained by new problems with flows of funds. A detailed audit of financial management after the shift of responsibility for implementation to KARI revealed problems of commingling of project funds, resulting in some financing of LVEMP activities out of other sources, and use of LVEMP funds for other activities. Delays in flow of funds even after the transfer of implementing responsibility constrained activity within the components, and reduced overall effectiveness." (#88, Lake Victoria Basin)
Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis: Agreement on transboundary priorities and root causes

YES

-
Development of Strategic Action Program (SAP)

YES

-

Information sources

#88: IWC6 Results Note (2011), #88: World Bank Terminal Evaluation (2006), #2405: IWC6 Results Note (2011), #3399: IWC6 Results Note (2011)

Lake Victoria is a shared asset of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, which jointly implemented the first phase of the project. Rwanda and Burundi are part of the upper watershed that drains into the Lake through the Kagera River, and are new members to the East African Community (EAC). The scope of the Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project (LVEMPII) has expanded to include these two upstream countries. Lake Victoria, which is part of the Nile River Basin system, is the second largest freshwater lake in the world (68,800 sq. Kms.). It contains a complex ecosystem with large invertebrate diversity, large swathes of wetlands, containing significant biodiversity, and a large transboundary watershed. The Lake is the largest inland water fishery sanctuary hosting around 200 endemic fish species. The fisher resources are direct and indirect source of livelihood for 3 million people, while the lake itself provides water for domestic, agricultural and industrial use. It also serves as a climate modulator – its large size makes it vital for weather and climate modulation in the region. The seasonal wind patterns influence the hydrological processes in the regions. Further, it serves as the natural storage for the White Nile, and sustains swathes of wetlands and other natural ecosystems around its shores and along the river.

Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project I (LVEMP I)

In response to the environmental management problems in the early 1990 including over-fishing, pollution, erosion/sedimentation, aquatic weeds, etc., the Bank and the GEF have supported cooperative efforts to improve understanding and management of the lake ecosystem through the first phase of the project, which was implemented from March 1997 to December 2005. LVEMP I, focused primarily on capacity in management of and knowledge base building on lake resources - studying water quality, circulation and hydrology aspects; assessing pollution and inflows; and surveying biodiversity. It was the first initiative of its kind in the area, a regional project addressing key environmental issues through trans-national cooperation. It started with very limited scientific information and generated useful research results on ecosystem interactions. It allowed experience to be gained through implementation of a variety of pilot activities, with many good results in community management of watershed resources. There were, however, problems in its implementation with some ratings being unsatisfactory or only marginally satisfactory. Project activities were insufficiently prioritized, and complementarities were not exploited. This essentially reflected the lack of a log-frame linked to measurable outcomes and coordinated across countries and sectors through a sound institutional structure. Many hard lessons have been learned and the proposed project has taken these into account in the preparation of LVEMP II.

The Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA) and Strategic Action Program (SAP)

In July 2005 the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) was established to provide a regional coordination framework for sustainable development of the Lake Victoria basin. Under its coordination, key Lake Victoria basin environmental issues were identified through the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), conducted in the five countries, and coalesced into a regional TDA (RTDA), through a systematic consensus based process. The key issues and related mitigation actions were subsequently prioritized in the regional Strategic Action Program (SAP). The top five prioritized key transboundary issues from the SAP process are: (i) Land, wetland, and forest degradation; (ii) Weak governance, policy, and institutional framework; (iii) Declining fish stocks, and loss of habitats and biodiversity; (iv) Increasing pollution and eutrophication; and (v) Unsustainable water resources management, declining water levels, and climate change. LVEMP II, therefore, has been designed to address these priority key transboundary issues, using Integrated Lake Basin Management (ILBM) and Ecosystem-based management approaches.

The operation

The proposed LVEMP II will focus on priority transboundary environmental issues, while building on the successes and addressing key gaps of the first phase. Key environmental issues were identified through the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), conducted in the five countries, and coalesced into a regional TDA (RTDA), through a systematic consensus based process. These issues and related actions were prioritized through the complementary regional Strategic Action Program (SAP). The RTDA examined the transboundary environmental problems that threaten the Lake Victoria ecosystem, and characterized them as falling within six thematic areas: (i) land use and degradation; (ii) water quality and pollution; (iii) water quantity and declining water balance; (iv) fisheries decline and threats to biodiversity; (v) governance of environmental resources; and (vi) socio-economic and cross-cutting issues. The top five prioritized key transboundary issues from the SAP process are: (i) Land, wetland, and forest degradation; (ii) Weak governance, policy, and institutional framework; (iii) Declining fish stocks, and loss of habitats and biodiversity; (iv) Increasing pollution and eutrophication; and (v) Unsustainable water resources management, declining water levels, and climate change. LVEMP II, therefore, will be designed to address these priority key transboundary issues, using an Integrated Lake Basin Management (ILBM) approach.

The challenges facing the lake and its resources were never thought to be feasibly solved through a project, thus the first phase was always envisioned as the beginning of a long term program addressing critical issues through a strategic framework. The proposed project builds on the outputs of and lessons learned from previous interventions including LVEMPI, the EU supported Fisheries Project, NELSAP three River Basin Management Projects (Kagera, Mara, and Sio-Malaba-Malakisi),and the broader Nile Basin Initiative (NBI), which includes the upstream and downstream riparians of Lake Victoria. It seeks to support crucial interventions of this program, particularly in going beyond research, knowledge and capacity building activities of the first phase, to integrated lake management and impact oriented activities. GEF support will complement significant IDA and Governments’ funding, and will focus on strengthening institutions and mechanisms for management of transboundary resources (the lake and its watershed), policy reforms for improved management of transboundary resources (integrated water resources and land management), and joint planning to capture efficiencies and synergies, as well as catalyze priority transboundary investments.

The project objective above is drawn from the Lake Victoria Vision, a harmonized regional long-term vision that was based on national visioning processes in the three riparian countries based on participatory consultations involving over 11,000 people, representing communities and other stakeholders, and adopted by the East African Community (EAC). One regional and three national task forces guided the processes.

The project has 4 proposed components:

  1. Building the information base for governance and growth (USD 30 million): using a competitive grant approach the work includes applied research, ecosystem monitoring, and technological adaptation/innovation. It also includes capacity building, scientific data management protocols development, establishment of an integrated M&E framework. GEF support will focus on strengthening regional capacity in LVBC for data management and sharing, as well as contribute to monitoring Lake Basin ecosystems health.

  2. Strengthening governance of transboundary resources (USD 25 million): including strengthening of key policy, legal, and institutional frameworks; establishing regional and national regulatory standards and enforcement mechanism; harmonizing NRM regulatory frameworks regionally; piloting appropriate economic incentive mechanisms; harmonizing the planning and coordination of NRM regimes, capacity building, spatial planning; and developing an integrated Water Resources Management plan. This will include support to strengthening regional GIS-based MIS. GEF financing will support actions for improved transboundary resource management, as well as the development of sustainable resource use and management plans for the key resources. This would include integrated water and fisheries management plans, and basin-wide watershed management strategy. Further, it will contribute to mainstreaming SLM initiatives into national policies and programs. The fish levy trust, once operationalized, will provide sustained financing for governance of natural resources.

  3. Enhancing sustainable economic growth (USD 89.8 million): including, supporting activities to reduce point and non-point pollution sources; providing economic incentives to reduce pollution; supporting strategic public investments in reducing pollution; supporting environmentally friendly investments, including community based investments in NRM; promoting private sector investments that are environmentally sustainable; building capacity for EAs for private sector investments, PES for key services, environmental certification, investments in strategic sectors, implementation of NRM plans, value addition of sustainably harvested NR products, SLM and watershed management initiatives. GEF support will catalyze community-based watershed management investments through strengthening community capacity for integrated natural resources management planning and implementation and providing incentives for SLM adoption (including support to design of environmental services payments, targeted matching grants etc). It will help promote market oriented innovative instruments, such as user based fees, in order to develop sustainable mechanisms for financing long-term ecosystem management as well as strengthen alternative non natural-resources based livelihoods.

.

  1. Stakeholder participation, communication, and monitoring and evaluation (USD 9.5 million): including, development of information sharing protocols, establishing satellite communication system, capacity building for environmental information dissemination, development of a communication strategy, support to community monitoring of natural resources and their contribution to the MIS.

  2. Project Management (USD 7.3 million): It includes short-term training of implementing agencies’ staff; study tours and knowledge exchange/sharing programs by stakeholders; Technical Assistance; farmer and fisher extension services; regional and national coordination meetings; motor vehicle, office, and laboratory operations and maintenance expenses; and project monitoring and evaluation activities.

Global benefits:

The improved management of the Lake and its Basin will arrest the deterioration of the ecosystem; help it retain its resiliency; and continued provision of environmental and economic services, such as biodiversity, hydrological and weather cycles, production of materials and goods, extraction of resources, tourism and quality of life to communities dependent on it. GEF resources will strengthen the transboundary planning, management and monitoring of resources by strengthening institutions for governance of transboundary resources, and supporting ILBM initiatives. The project will also be able to strengthen strengthening the coping and adaptive capacities of communities to current climate variability and emerging climatic trends (e.g. increased frequencies of droughts and/or floods, more erratic rainy seasons). Broad climatic trends indicate that the Lake region is likely to get wetter with more intense rainfall. A comprehensive program of watershed management in the basin will help reduce the impact of flooding, while water management mechanisms and investments will help smoothen the cyclical impacts of droughts and floods, and improve overall water resources management and availability. At the regional level, efforts will be made to identify and cross-boundary issues arising from the impact of climate change on the availability of natural resources, etc.

Project Category

River/Lake

Waterbodies

Lake Victoria

Ecosystems

Lake

Budget

USD 140,140,800

Total Cost of the project

USD 6,800,000

GEF Allocation to project

Partners

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (WB)

The main focus is on helping the poorest people and the poorest countries, but for all its clients the Bank emphasizes the need for:Investing in people, particularly through basic health and educationFocusing on social development, inclusion, governance, and institution-building as key elements of poverty reduction Strengthening the ability of the governments to deliver quality services, efficiently and transparently Protecting the environment Supporting and encouraging private business developmentPromoting reforms to create a stable macroeconomic environment, conducive to investment and long-term planning.

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)

The overall target of Sweden’s development assistance is to ensure that those in poverty have the ability to improve their living conditions. To carry out this assignment effectively and strategically, Sida has divided its work into five areas.

Contacts

Gerson Japhet Fumbuka

Programme manager

Pius Mabuba

Principal Executive Engineer

William Mabula

National focal Point Officer

Raymond Julius Mngodo

Regional Project Coordinator

Lino Musana

National Project Coordinator

Omari Mwinjaka

Officer

Francisca Owuor

Project National Coordinator

Charles Martin Jjuuko

Communications & Development Awareness Officer

GEF ID

3399

Status

closed

Focal Area

Multi Focal Area

Project Type

Full-Size Project

Start Date

03 Mar, 2009

End Date

22 Dec, 2017

Last Update

06 Mar, 2018